Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
Airport Passenger Total Climbs Higher in Tourism-Dependent Las Vegas editorial policy.
  1. Elys Game Tech Expands Newgioco Brand in Italy Through New Playtech Deal, US Next

Compare Accounts
×
New Jersey Sports Betting Smashes Monthly Handle Record, Oddsmakers Take $562M in Wagers
Provider
Name
Description
Fast-Moving Fire at Cambodian Casino Resort Claims Lives, Leaves Dozens Injured  North Korean Hackers More Interested in Cash (and Gambling Sites) Than State Secrets  President Marcos Reaffirms Ban on E-Sabong in the Philippines  Blackjack Players Who Sued Massachusetts Casinos Over ‘Illegal’ Odds Learn House Always Wins  Century Casino Shares Surge After Analyst Starts Coverage With ‘Outperform’ Rating, Calls Stock ‘Cheapest’ in Regional Gaming Group  Skillz Stock Pops on Increasing WallStreetBets Mentions  Kaufmann ‘Confident’ Iowa Governor Will Sign Sports Betting Bill Into Law  Unlucky 13 Casino in Macau Facing Further Opening Delays to March 2019  CES 2022 in Danger of Cancellation, as Tech Giants Facebook, Amazon Fold on Las Vegas  Entain Could Again Raise Offer for Tabcorp Media, Sports Betting Units